I was recently ordered to pay the equivalent to my mortgage in child support. I know that child support is a very touchy subject to those people who are paying it, getting it or should be getting it. Like a lot of things in our society, the wrong doing of some, in this case men who don't fulfill their obligations as fathers,causes the government to regulate us as in dictating what is a necessary amount one should pay to help raise his children.
I'm all for child support. I do believe that if you bring a child into this world ,whether it was willingly or not,you must meet your financial obligations. I said meet, not exceed by an obscene amount. After I had my son, I sold my two door car and got a four door, I bought a house, stopped waiting tables, and got married. I was determined to change from a single guys mentality to one of a provider and full time father. Unfortunately the mother of my children did not have the same desire. She decided she did not want to be a mother or a wife and we divorced. Life happens. I got full custody of the kids. And even though I was the primary care giver I was still ordered to pay child support. The reason given was because "our gaps in pay were so wide" she needed financial help for the times she had her visitation. I was penalized for the fact that she lost her job. At some point in time the courts developed a program that takes various information that after inputed,determines the amount of support payments. There are no questions related to the ex's character or motives. This is because their faults should not affect the amount of child support which is considered the child's right. In my case, I provided for my kids for over 5 years with no issues. Sports, paid for, bikes paid for, medical insurance paid for etc. etc. I never asked for any money because I felt that I was the father and all these things were my responsibility.None of the latter is taken into account when going before a judge. My integrity however, did aid in my ability to keep my visitations which were being threatened to be taken away. The reason for attempting to take away my visitation was to try to obtain a larger amount of child support.
Like a lot of men, I am now facing a huge lifestyle change. And a fact that is not taken into enough consideration, so are the children. When they come to visit dad, they will not be able to enjoy some of the pleasures such as pizza, movies and other things that people on a tight budget don't enjoy as much. I as well enjoyed the benefits of having my wife only working part time. This enabled us to not have to use babysitters and the kids were able to enjoy a lot more of what our city has to offer during their visits. In order for us to meet my child support obligations, she will have to work full time, in fact during the kids last visit I was forced to get a babysitter. My wife has never separated any of her income from our household. She has taken my daughter shopping for clothes with what she could call "her money". This is what she "bought" into.
But it's apparently not o.k. for the kids mom's husband to provide for the children of the woman he married. When entering into a blended family situation, you should meet the immediate needs of the family living under your roof. If your lack of work do to bad weather, lack of education or macho pride keeps your wife from working it shouldn't be held against the father. If mom has a lack of income that causes them to not afford their Navigator registration and payments, then mom should look for a job, not take advantage of the system.
I enjoy taking my kids shopping for clothes. I like seeing that my daughters foot grew a half size. I want to tell my kids that "they won't get anything if they don't behave". Do fathers who pay child support lose that right? Can I still keep my kids in control with threats of not getting rewards? My son told me that, "Mom just wants money so she won't have to ask you for anything". When two people get a divorce they stop being husband and wife but should never stop being parents. They should still communicate as to what is necessary and what is not.
Unfortunately we don't live in a perfect world. Instead we live in a world full of dead beat dads with an unwillingness to support their children. This unwillingness forced the government to put tools in place to insure that their children are provided for. These tools are then used by vindictive ex's as a weapon against men who sincerely want to play an active role in the upbringing of their children. Even though we men suffer because of a fundamentally defective system ,it's the children who are always the ones who suffer the most.